To say that Mitt Romney wants to “have it both ways” is to understate the number of ways in which Mitt Romney wants to have it. Mitt Romney wants multiple overlapping versions of it, with another set parked in an offshore subsidiary, back-dated and post-dated for tax purposes. Having dealt with CEOs and their attorneys for a few years, I find Romney’s approach eerily familiar. Confronted with any sort of financial irregularity, they would tell you that they didn’t do it, or that there was nothing wrong with it, or that it was an isolated or an industry-wide practice (sometimes in the same paragraph) and that anyway they disclaimed any liability three mergers ago. And while you were having this conversation, their lobbyists would have managed to pass a law making whatever they did retroactively legal.
This is all completely, maddeningly legal. And clever people like Mitt Romney can make piles of money in the gaps between the letter and the spirit of the law. But it comes at a cost. Just as Bob Dole and John Kerry had a hard time avoiding the arcane language of the Senate, Mitt Romney does not realize how ridiculous he sounds to 99.5% of the country when he says he was simultaneously CEO of a company but had nothing to do with it. Or when his spokesman says he “retroactively retired” (the guy who made the Etch-a-Sketch comment is looking pretty good now). To people in Mitt Romney’s orbit, everything is malleable – stock options and pension rights can be back-dated, front-loaded, manipulated in whatever way necessary to ensure that those making the rules maximize their profits.
As best as I can determine, the reason that Romney continued to be listed as CEO of Bain was that the company wanted to practice a very mild form of fraud. While Romney was off saving the Olympics, they wanted to reassure investors that Romney was still in some sense calling the shots. If in fact Romney really was out of the loop, then Bain was engaged in a little deception, but nothing that was legally actionable or even particularly shady by Wall Street standards. This is why Romney gets so genuinely indignant when questioned about this stuff. His behavior was perfectly fine by the standards of his peers. It’s the kind of brilliant flexibility that makes money. But in politics it just makes you Multiple Choice Mitt.